<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Pr. CIT Exceeds Jurisdiction by Misinterpreting Law, Wrongly Directs Penalty Proceedings u/s 271AAB.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62739</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - Not only the Pr. CIT had on the basis of a misconceived reading of the position of law directed the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings in the case of the assessee u/s 271AAB of the Act, but he had also exceeded his jurisdiction while issuing such directions. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 12:10:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 12:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Pr. CIT Exceeds Jurisdiction by Misinterpreting Law, Wrongly Directs Penalty Proceedings u/s 271AAB.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62739</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - Not only the Pr. CIT had on the basis of a misconceived reading of the position of law directed the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings in the case of the assessee u/s 271AAB of the Act, but he had also exceeded his jurisdiction while issuing such directions. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 12:10:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>