Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Existence of Fixed Place Permanent Establishment (“Fixed Place PE”) and Supervisory Permanent Establishment (“Supervisory PE”) - India-Japan DTAA - Merely providing access to the premises by FRL for the purpose of providing agreed services by the assessee would not amount to the place being at the disposal of the assessee. - Since the goods were manufactured outside India, sale of goods took place outside India and consideration was also received by the assessee outside India, title passed outside India and hence the assessee has not carried out any operation in India in relation to supply of the raw material and capital goods. We therefore hold that the assessee does not have a Fixed Place PE in India. - AT
Existence of Fixed Place Permanent Establishment (“Fixed Place PE”) and Supervisory Permanent Establishment (“Supervisory PE”) - India-Japan DTAA - Merely providing access to the premises by FRL for the purpose of providing agreed services by the assessee would not amount to the place being at the disposal of the assessee. - Since the goods were manufactured outside India, sale of goods took place outside India and consideration was also received by the assessee outside India, title passed outside India and hence the assessee has not carried out any operation in India in relation to supply of the raw material and capital goods. We therefore hold that the assessee does not have a Fixed Place PE in India. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
