Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Existence of Fixed Place Permanent Establishment (“Fixed Place PE”) and Supervisory Permanent Establishment (“Supervisory PE”) - India-Japan DTAA - Merely providing access to the premises by FRL for the purpose of providing agreed services by the assessee would not amount to the place being at the disposal of the assessee. - Since the goods were manufactured outside India, sale of goods took place outside India and consideration was also received by the assessee outside India, title passed outside India and hence the assessee has not carried out any operation in India in relation to supply of the raw material and capital goods. We therefore hold that the assessee does not have a Fixed Place PE in India. - AT
Existence of Fixed Place Permanent Establishment (“Fixed Place PE”) and Supervisory Permanent Establishment (“Supervisory PE”) - India-Japan DTAA - Merely providing access to the premises by FRL for the purpose of providing agreed services by the assessee would not amount to the place being at the disposal of the assessee. - Since the goods were manufactured outside India, sale of goods took place outside India and consideration was also received by the assessee outside India, title passed outside India and hence the assessee has not carried out any operation in India in relation to supply of the raw material and capital goods. We therefore hold that the assessee does not have a Fixed Place PE in India. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.