Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - liability of a Director of a company - vicarious liability - It is clear from the perusal of the complaint that there is no specific averment that applicant is involved in day-to-day affairs of the company. There is only general allegation that applicant is a Director of the company. The documents filed by the applicant establishes that the applicant was a nominee Director and who has now resigned - thus, it is clear that in absence of specific allegations about the applicant he can not be prosecuted for any offence under section 138 N.I. Act. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - liability of a Director of a company - vicarious liability - It is clear from the perusal of the complaint that there is no specific averment that applicant is involved in day-to-day affairs of the company. There is only general allegation that applicant is a Director of the company. The documents filed by the applicant establishes that the applicant was a nominee Director and who has now resigned - thus, it is clear that in absence of specific allegations about the applicant he can not be prosecuted for any offence under section 138 N.I. Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
