Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Disallowance of rent - allowable revenue expenditure u/s 37 or not? - In this case the appellant has not filed any documents to establish that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the expenditure. The burden of proof is on appellant. Appellant failed to discharge the same. - AT
Disallowance of rent - allowable revenue expenditure u/s 37 or not? - In this case the appellant has not filed any documents to establish that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the expenditure. The burden of proof is on appellant. Appellant failed to discharge the same. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
