Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Quantum of penalty levied under Section 114 (iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 - fraudulent export as goods were grossly undervalued - the appellant has acted only on the instruction of the employer and more so on the basis of the signed documents i.e. invoice given by his employer. - The exorbitant penalty of ₹ 75 Lacs is not justified - the penalty is reduced from ₹ 75 Lacs to ₹ 25,000/-. - AT
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
