Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Assessment u/s 153A - beneficiary of bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove - The whole basis of making additions is third-party statement and no opportunity of cross-examination has been provided to the assessee to confront these parties. As against this, the assessee’s position that that the transactions were genuine and duly supported by various documentary evidences, could not be disturbed by the revenue. - Additions deleted - AT
Assessment u/s 153A - beneficiary of bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove - The whole basis of making additions is third-party statement and no opportunity of cross-examination has been provided to the assessee to confront these parties. As against this, the assessee’s position that that the transactions were genuine and duly supported by various documentary evidences, could not be disturbed by the revenue. - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
