Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of Section 194A(3)(ixa) - tax deducted at source on the interest payable under an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (“MACT”) - The petitioner is not personally aggrieved by the award of the MACT. A challenge of this nature would have to be brought before the Court by a person aggrieved. We see no reason to entertain a petition which is styled one filed in public interest. - SC
Validity of Section 194A(3)(ixa) - tax deducted at source on the interest payable under an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (“MACT”) - The petitioner is not personally aggrieved by the award of the MACT. A challenge of this nature would have to be brought before the Court by a person aggrieved. We see no reason to entertain a petition which is styled one filed in public interest. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.