<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Declines Petition Challenging Tax Deduction on MACT Awards; Emphasizes Need for Aggrieved Party to File.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61187</link>
    <description>Validity of Section 194A(3)(ixa) - tax deducted at source on the interest payable under an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (“MACT”) - The petitioner is not personally aggrieved by the award of the MACT. A challenge of this nature would have to be brought before the Court by a person aggrieved. We see no reason to entertain a petition which is styled one filed in public interest. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:30:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Declines Petition Challenging Tax Deduction on MACT Awards; Emphasizes Need for Aggrieved Party to File.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61187</link>
      <description>Validity of Section 194A(3)(ixa) - tax deducted at source on the interest payable under an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (“MACT”) - The petitioner is not personally aggrieved by the award of the MACT. A challenge of this nature would have to be brought before the Court by a person aggrieved. We see no reason to entertain a petition which is styled one filed in public interest. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:30:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>