Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption u/s 11 - Proof of charitable object u/s 2(15) - Rule of Consistency - AO ignored the cardinal principle of judicial discipline in not adhering to the orders passed by the Appellate Authority. Thus, for all the above reasons we find that the Tribunal ought not to have reversed the order passed by the CIT(A). - HC
Exemption u/s 11 - Proof of charitable object u/s 2(15) - Rule of Consistency - AO ignored the cardinal principle of judicial discipline in not adhering to the orders passed by the Appellate Authority. Thus, for all the above reasons we find that the Tribunal ought not to have reversed the order passed by the CIT(A). - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
