<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds Section 11 Exemption; Criticizes AO for Ignoring Appellate Orders in Charitable Objects Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59579</link>
    <description>Exemption u/s 11 - Proof of charitable object u/s 2(15) - Rule of Consistency - AO ignored the cardinal principle of judicial discipline in not adhering to the orders passed by the Appellate Authority. Thus, for all the above reasons we find that the Tribunal ought not to have reversed the order passed by the CIT(A). - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 16:31:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 16:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds Section 11 Exemption; Criticizes AO for Ignoring Appellate Orders in Charitable Objects Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59579</link>
      <description>Exemption u/s 11 - Proof of charitable object u/s 2(15) - Rule of Consistency - AO ignored the cardinal principle of judicial discipline in not adhering to the orders passed by the Appellate Authority. Thus, for all the above reasons we find that the Tribunal ought not to have reversed the order passed by the CIT(A). - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 16:31:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>