Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Bogus purchases - information that was received by the A.O from the DGIT(Inv.) - now when the assessee had not only substantiated the authenticity of the purchases claimed to have been made from the aforementioned parties on the basis of supporting documentary evidence which had not been dislodged by the lower authorities, but had also got the confirmations from the respective parties alongwith their “affidavits”, therefore, there could have been no justification in the absence of any material proving to the contrary to doubt the genuineness of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties. - Additions deleted - AT
Bogus purchases - information that was received by the A.O from the DGIT(Inv.) - now when the assessee had not only substantiated the authenticity of the purchases claimed to have been made from the aforementioned parties on the basis of supporting documentary evidence which had not been dislodged by the lower authorities, but had also got the confirmations from the respective parties alongwith their “affidavits”, therefore, there could have been no justification in the absence of any material proving to the contrary to doubt the genuineness of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties. - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.