Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Allegation of corruption against the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) - Irregularity in passing the assessment order - There can be no doubt with regard to the fact that the assessment orders passed by the petitioner are in the nature of definitive judgments in legal proceedings - He had discharged functions as a “Judge” - The petitioner is entitled to get the protection envisaged under Section 3(1) of the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 in respect of the assessment orders - Prosecution against him, which is based merely on those assessment orders, is barred and not maintainable in law - HC
Allegation of corruption against the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) - Irregularity in passing the assessment order - There can be no doubt with regard to the fact that the assessment orders passed by the petitioner are in the nature of definitive judgments in legal proceedings - He had discharged functions as a “Judge” - The petitioner is entitled to get the protection envisaged under Section 3(1) of the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 in respect of the assessment orders - Prosecution against him, which is based merely on those assessment orders, is barred and not maintainable in law - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
