Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Addition u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b) - difference in the value of shares transferred by the assessee company to its holding company, pursuant to a scheme approved by the Hon’ble Jurisdicational High Court - the appointed date is 01/04/2013 and hence, the value considered by the assessee, which is nearer to the date is appropriate. The valuation date taken by the AO is not in accordance with the appointed date approved by Hon’ble High Court and in this view of the matter appointed date taken and the valuation done by the AO is incorrect. - AT
Addition u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b) - difference in the value of shares transferred by the assessee company to its holding company, pursuant to a scheme approved by the Hon’ble Jurisdicational High Court - the appointed date is 01/04/2013 and hence, the value considered by the assessee, which is nearer to the date is appropriate. The valuation date taken by the AO is not in accordance with the appointed date approved by Hon’ble High Court and in this view of the matter appointed date taken and the valuation done by the AO is incorrect. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.