Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Siphoning of funds - collection of money from the public issue by publishing prospects in the year 1994 by the directors and promoters of the Company - petitioner was professional director - the petitioner being professional director is not involved into day today affairs of the company and there is no material on record to even suggest that the petitioner availed any benefit in capacity of professional director of the company. - considering the bare averments made in the complaint, the same deserves to be quashed and set aside qua the petitioner - HC
Siphoning of funds - collection of money from the public issue by publishing prospects in the year 1994 by the directors and promoters of the Company - petitioner was professional director - the petitioner being professional director is not involved into day today affairs of the company and there is no material on record to even suggest that the petitioner availed any benefit in capacity of professional director of the company. - considering the bare averments made in the complaint, the same deserves to be quashed and set aside qua the petitioner - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.