Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Validity of Section 272(1)(e) of Companies Act, 2013 - Having held that Registrar and 'a person authorized by the Central Government' fall into different categories, it does not warrant reading down Section 272(3) of the Companies Act - both points for consideration are held in the negative. - HC
Validity of Section 272(1)(e) of Companies Act, 2013 - Having held that Registrar and 'a person authorized by the Central Government' fall into different categories, it does not warrant reading down Section 272(3) of the Companies Act - both points for consideration are held in the negative. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.