<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Section 272(1)(e) of Companies Act, 2013 Valid; Registrar and Authorized Person Are Distinct Entities.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57804</link>
    <description>Validity of Section 272(1)(e) of Companies Act, 2013 - Having held that Registrar and &#039;a person authorized by the Central Government&#039; fall into different categories, it does not warrant reading down Section 272(3) of the Companies Act - both points for consideration are held in the negative. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:19:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Section 272(1)(e) of Companies Act, 2013 Valid; Registrar and Authorized Person Are Distinct Entities.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57804</link>
      <description>Validity of Section 272(1)(e) of Companies Act, 2013 - Having held that Registrar and &#039;a person authorized by the Central Government&#039; fall into different categories, it does not warrant reading down Section 272(3) of the Companies Act - both points for consideration are held in the negative. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:19:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>