Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 27, 2021Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP by Operational Creditors - the Appellant has not fulfilled any of the conditions enumerated in Sub-Section 2 of Section 14 of the Limitation Act - thus it is not correct to accept the contention of the Appellant that the winding-up petition No.6 of 2015 was dismissed on the ground of mis-joinder of parties, and the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed to appellant. - Relaxation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed for unexplained period of about two years and ten months. - AT
Initiation of CIRP by Operational Creditors - the Appellant has not fulfilled any of the conditions enumerated in Sub-Section 2 of Section 14 of the Limitation Act - thus it is not correct to accept the contention of the Appellant that the winding-up petition No.6 of 2015 was dismissed on the ground of mis-joinder of parties, and the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed to appellant. - Relaxation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed for unexplained period of about two years and ten months. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
