Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Levy of penalty u/s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - It was therefore stated that the dyeing units were not engaged in any manufacturing activity - job work/works contract or not - They are merely service provider. If a liberalized interpretation is given in the light of the above decisions, they will be entitled to the benefit of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 as was claimed by the petitioner - However, the scheme of the concession is specific under Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Therefore, the Courts cannot aid evasion of tax by reading down the express language of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. - HC
Levy of penalty u/s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - It was therefore stated that the dyeing units were not engaged in any manufacturing activity - job work/works contract or not - They are merely service provider. If a liberalized interpretation is given in the light of the above decisions, they will be entitled to the benefit of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 as was claimed by the petitioner - However, the scheme of the concession is specific under Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Therefore, the Courts cannot aid evasion of tax by reading down the express language of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
