Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons were supplied to the assessee only on 21.11.2017 and assessee on the same day filed the objections to the reopening of the assessment which have been disposed of vide Order Dated 05.12.2017 - A.O. within 23 days after disposing of the objections of the assessee passed the impugned re-assessment order Dated 28.12.2017. Thus, no time of four weeks have been granted to the assessee to take remedial action - Thus re-assessment order framed u/s 147/143(3) is bad in Law and deserves to be quashed. - AT
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons were supplied to the assessee only on 21.11.2017 and assessee on the same day filed the objections to the reopening of the assessment which have been disposed of vide Order Dated 05.12.2017 - A.O. within 23 days after disposing of the objections of the assessee passed the impugned re-assessment order Dated 28.12.2017. Thus, no time of four weeks have been granted to the assessee to take remedial action - Thus re-assessment order framed u/s 147/143(3) is bad in Law and deserves to be quashed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.