Tribunal quashes re-assessment for procedural lapses by A.O., deletes additions made under sections 68 and 69C.

The Tribunal quashed the re-assessment proceedings due to procedural lapses by the A.O., specifically the failure to allow the statutory four-week period for the assessee to seek legal remedies after disposing of objections. Consequently, all additions made in the re-assessment order, including Rs. 10 lakhs under section 68 and Rs. 17,500/- under section 69C, were deleted. The appeal of the assessee was allowed in full.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of re-assessment proceedings under sections 147/148 of the I.T. Act, 1961.
2. Addition of Rs. 10 lakhs on account of share capital under section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961.
3. Addition of Rs. 17,500/- on account of commission paid under section 69C of the I.T. Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Re-assessment Proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the I.T. Act, 1961:
The assessee challenged the re-assessment proceedings initiated by the A.O. under sections 147/148 of the I.T. Act, 1961. The key contention was that the A.O. failed to provide the reasons for reopening the assessment within a reasonable time. The assessee requested the reasons on 25.04.2017, but they were supplied only on 21.11.2017. The assessee filed objections on the same day, which were disposed of by the A.O. on 05.12.2017. The A.O. passed the re-assessment order on 28.12.2017, within 23 days of disposing of the objections, without granting the statutory four weeks for the assessee to seek legal remedies. Citing the ITAT Delhi A-SMC Bench decision in Smt. Kamlesh Goel vs. ITO and the Hon’ble Bombay High Court's ruling in Bharat Jayantilal Patel, the Tribunal held that the re-assessment order was bad in law and deserved to be quashed. The Tribunal emphasized that the A.O. must allow four weeks after disposing of objections before proceeding with the re-assessment, as per the Supreme Court’s directive in GKN Driveshaft (India) Ltd. vs. ITO.

2. Addition of Rs. 10 Lakhs on Account of Share Capital under Section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961:
The A.O. added Rs. 10 lakhs to the assessee's income, claiming it was unexplained share capital received from M/s. Attractive Finlease Pvt. Ltd. The A.O. based this addition on information from the DDIT (Inv.) that the share capital was bogus. However, since the Tribunal quashed the re-assessment proceedings, the addition of Rs. 10 lakhs under section 68 was also deemed invalid and deleted.

3. Addition of Rs. 17,500/- on Account of Commission Paid under Section 69C of the I.T. Act, 1961:
The A.O. also added Rs. 17,500/- to the assessee's income as unexplained expenditure under section 69C. Similar to the share capital addition, this was based on the re-assessment proceedings. Given that the re-assessment order was quashed, the addition of Rs. 17,500/- was also invalid and deleted.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal quashed the re-assessment proceedings due to procedural lapses by the A.O., specifically the failure to allow the statutory four-week period for the assessee to seek legal remedies after disposing of objections. Consequently, all additions made in the re-assessment order, including Rs. 10 lakhs under section 68 and Rs. 17,500/- under section 69C, were deleted. The appeal of the assessee was allowed in full.

---