Composite residential flat exemption upheld where supplementary agreement merged adjoining units and additional evidence supported the taxpayer's inve...
Urgent interim relief exception permits commercial suit without pre-institution mediation where immediate disclosure and asset protection are genuinel...
Portal order discrepancies invalidated rectification rejection, requiring fresh reasoned consideration after hearing and prompt communication of the o...
Profiteering - restaurant service supplied by the Respondent - the GST rate of 5% has been charged w.e.f. 15.11.2017 however the base prices of 170 products have been increased more than their commensurate prices w.e.f. 15.11.2017 which established that because of the increase in the base prices the cum-tax prices paid by the consumers were not reduced commensurately, despite the reduction in the GST rate. - As per the provisions of Sec 171 (1) read with Rule 133 (1) the profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 6,66,700/- - NAPA
Profiteering - restaurant service supplied by the Respondent - the GST rate of 5% has been charged w.e.f. 15.11.2017 however the base prices of 170 products have been increased more than their commensurate prices w.e.f. 15.11.2017 which established that because of the increase in the base prices the cum-tax prices paid by the consumers were not reduced commensurately, despite the reduction in the GST rate. - As per the provisions of Sec 171 (1) read with Rule 133 (1) the profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 6,66,700/- - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
