Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Rectification u/s 254 - Assessment proceedings u/s 158BC - jurisdiction questioned by the assessee with reference to Section 158BD - it is the Tribunal which has committed error in restricting itself to legal ground and in not addressing itself on certain other grounds of substantial nature without any fault attributable to the assessee. In such a situation, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred over the technical considerations pitted against it by way of limitation, to shun an apparent miscarriage of justice. - Remedy sought by the assessee can not be frustrated on the grounds of bar of limitation without weighing the circumstances of the case. - AT
Rectification u/s 254 - Assessment proceedings u/s 158BC - jurisdiction questioned by the assessee with reference to Section 158BD - it is the Tribunal which has committed error in restricting itself to legal ground and in not addressing itself on certain other grounds of substantial nature without any fault attributable to the assessee. In such a situation, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred over the technical considerations pitted against it by way of limitation, to shun an apparent miscarriage of justice. - Remedy sought by the assessee can not be frustrated on the grounds of bar of limitation without weighing the circumstances of the case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.