Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition being the amounts credited in the capital reserve - income u/s.56 - conversion of partnership firm into company - pursuant to assessee firm receiving capital contribution from PEL to the tune of ₹ 2117.45 Crores, PEL had become 75% partner in the assessee firm. Hence, for all practical purposes, the assessee firm belongs to Piramal group and not to Shriram group as understood by the ld. AO in her assessment order. - there cannot be any allegation that can be levelled on the assessee in the instant case that the capital reserve was created as part of a scheme to avoid tax liability and is part of any colourable device. - there cannot be any taxability either u/s.56(1) or u/s.56(2)(viia) - AT
Addition being the amounts credited in the capital reserve - income u/s.56 - conversion of partnership firm into company - pursuant to assessee firm receiving capital contribution from PEL to the tune of ₹ 2117.45 Crores, PEL had become 75% partner in the assessee firm. Hence, for all practical purposes, the assessee firm belongs to Piramal group and not to Shriram group as understood by the ld. AO in her assessment order. - there cannot be any allegation that can be levelled on the assessee in the instant case that the capital reserve was created as part of a scheme to avoid tax liability and is part of any colourable device. - there cannot be any taxability either u/s.56(1) or u/s.56(2)(viia) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
