Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Addition being the amounts credited in the capital reserve - income u/s.56 - conversion of partnership firm into company - pursuant to assessee firm receiving capital contribution from PEL to the tune of ₹ 2117.45 Crores, PEL had become 75% partner in the assessee firm. Hence, for all practical purposes, the assessee firm belongs to Piramal group and not to Shriram group as understood by the ld. AO in her assessment order. - there cannot be any allegation that can be levelled on the assessee in the instant case that the capital reserve was created as part of a scheme to avoid tax liability and is part of any colourable device. - there cannot be any taxability either u/s.56(1) or u/s.56(2)(viia) - AT
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
