Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Addition being the amounts credited in the capital reserve - income u/s.56 - conversion of partnership firm into company - pursuant to assessee firm receiving capital contribution from PEL to the tune of ₹ 2117.45 Crores, PEL had become 75% partner in the assessee firm. Hence, for all practical purposes, the assessee firm belongs to Piramal group and not to Shriram group as understood by the ld. AO in her assessment order. - there cannot be any allegation that can be levelled on the assessee in the instant case that the capital reserve was created as part of a scheme to avoid tax liability and is part of any colourable device. - there cannot be any taxability either u/s.56(1) or u/s.56(2)(viia) - AT
Addition being the amounts credited in the capital reserve - income u/s.56 - conversion of partnership firm into company - pursuant to assessee firm receiving capital contribution from PEL to the tune of ₹ 2117.45 Crores, PEL had become 75% partner in the assessee firm. Hence, for all practical purposes, the assessee firm belongs to Piramal group and not to Shriram group as understood by the ld. AO in her assessment order. - there cannot be any allegation that can be levelled on the assessee in the instant case that the capital reserve was created as part of a scheme to avoid tax liability and is part of any colourable device. - there cannot be any taxability either u/s.56(1) or u/s.56(2)(viia) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
