Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of notice issued u/s 153A - merely because the seized record has been numbered as “HM” does not necessarily mean that the same was seized from a different person. - contention of the assessee that non-striking of inapplicable portion in the expression “assess/reassess” would vitiate the assessment proceedings is liable to be rejected, as it does not go to the root of the matter. - AT
Validity of notice issued u/s 153A - merely because the seized record has been numbered as “HM” does not necessarily mean that the same was seized from a different person. - contention of the assessee that non-striking of inapplicable portion in the expression “assess/reassess” would vitiate the assessment proceedings is liable to be rejected, as it does not go to the root of the matter. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.