<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Notice u/s 153A; &quot;HM&quot; Label on Seized Record Doesn&#039;t Invalidate Assessment Proceedings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55436</link>
    <description>Validity of notice issued u/s 153A - merely because the seized record has been numbered as “HM” does not necessarily mean that the same was seized from a different person. - contention of the assessee that non-striking of inapplicable portion in the expression “assess/reassess” would vitiate the assessment proceedings is liable to be rejected, as it does not go to the root of the matter. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 09:52:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 09:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Notice u/s 153A; &quot;HM&quot; Label on Seized Record Doesn&#039;t Invalidate Assessment Proceedings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55436</link>
      <description>Validity of notice issued u/s 153A - merely because the seized record has been numbered as “HM” does not necessarily mean that the same was seized from a different person. - contention of the assessee that non-striking of inapplicable portion in the expression “assess/reassess” would vitiate the assessment proceedings is liable to be rejected, as it does not go to the root of the matter. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 09:52:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>