Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Exemption u/s 10 (23C) (vi) - Burden lies upon the Revenue to bring on record the evidence to rebut the claim of the Appellant Trust and to establish that the activities carried out and the expenditure incurred by the Assessee Trust could not be related to the educational activities of the Appellant Trust by any stretch of imagination. - mere reference to the expenditure incurred and the Head of expenditure in question while rejecting the Application u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act is not enough to reject the Application under the provisions of the Act. - HC
Exemption u/s 10 (23C) (vi) - Burden lies upon the Revenue to bring on record the evidence to rebut the claim of the Appellant Trust and to establish that the activities carried out and the expenditure incurred by the Assessee Trust could not be related to the educational activities of the Appellant Trust by any stretch of imagination. - mere reference to the expenditure incurred and the Head of expenditure in question while rejecting the Application u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act is not enough to reject the Application under the provisions of the Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
