Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Assessment u/s 158BC - Unexplained investment - Tribunal further has erroneously and perversely held that as question was not asked to the assessee, the assessee cannot be faulted for not furnishing the details and the person to whom the land was sold and only because the assessee was a broker and he was not expected to make investment of his money. It appears that such findings are arrived at by the Tribunal only on the basis of the presumption and assumption - HC
Assessment u/s 158BC - Unexplained investment - Tribunal further has erroneously and perversely held that as question was not asked to the assessee, the assessee cannot be faulted for not furnishing the details and the person to whom the land was sold and only because the assessee was a broker and he was not expected to make investment of his money. It appears that such findings are arrived at by the Tribunal only on the basis of the presumption and assumption - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.