Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject project in the post-GST regime and there wasn't any demand raised by the Respondent in the pre-GST regime. - The instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017
Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject project in the post-GST regime and there wasn't any demand raised by the Respondent in the pre-GST regime. - The instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
