<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No Anti-Profiteering Violation in Flat Purchase Case, Says Section 171 of CGST Act 2017.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53672</link>
    <description>Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject project in the post-GST regime and there wasn&#039;t any demand raised by the Respondent in the pre-GST regime. - The instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:28:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No Anti-Profiteering Violation in Flat Purchase Case, Says Section 171 of CGST Act 2017.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53672</link>
      <description>Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject project in the post-GST regime and there wasn&#039;t any demand raised by the Respondent in the pre-GST regime. - The instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:28:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>