Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Disallowance u/s. 14A read with Rule 8D - expenditure related to Dividend income - A bald assertion by AO that he is not accepting the assessee’s claim is arbitrary and so cannot be justified. The AO has not applied his mind while dealing with the issue and his action smacks of arbitrariness and therefore his action cannot be sustained.
Disallowance u/s. 14A read with Rule 8D - expenditure related to Dividend income - A bald assertion by AO that he is not accepting the assessee’s claim is arbitrary and so cannot be justified. The AO has not applied his mind while dealing with the issue and his action smacks of arbitrariness and therefore his action cannot be sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.