ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the expenditure so claimed was genuine and incurred for developing the property - No justification in the order of the ld. CIT(A) for sustaining disallowance of 40% against the 50% disallowance made by the A.O., therefore, the A.O. is directed to allow full expenditure so incurred by the assessee.
Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the expenditure so claimed was genuine and incurred for developing the property - No justification in the order of the ld. CIT(A) for sustaining disallowance of 40% against the 50% disallowance made by the A.O., therefore, the A.O. is directed to allow full expenditure so incurred by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
