Income Disclosure Scheme immunity and search-material requirements barred further share-transaction additions in unabated assessments under section 15...
Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Who is the importer - No deponent has clearly mentioned that they were fully aware of the fact of the appellants being the owner of the goods and have merely mentioned that they were told so by the other concerned persons. There is virtually no evidence in the present case so as to show that the appellant were the actual importer of the goods - No penalty - AT
Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Who is the importer - No deponent has clearly mentioned that they were fully aware of the fact of the appellants being the owner of the goods and have merely mentioned that they were told so by the other concerned persons. There is virtually no evidence in the present case so as to show that the appellant were the actual importer of the goods - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
