Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Reversal of refund order - principles of unjust enrichment - incidence of duty not passed on - It is not invariably true that when any amount is shown as expenditure or any expenditure is required to be made, the same has to be absorbed in costing of final product unless there is a proof that pricing of the final product has been specifically increased on that score - Refund allowed.
Reversal of refund order - principles of unjust enrichment - incidence of duty not passed on - It is not invariably true that when any amount is shown as expenditure or any expenditure is required to be made, the same has to be absorbed in costing of final product unless there is a proof that pricing of the final product has been specifically increased on that score - Refund allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
