<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Reversed: No Proof Duty Cost Passed to Consumers; Unjust Enrichment Principles Applied in Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51681</link>
    <description>Reversal of refund order - principles of unjust enrichment - incidence of duty not passed on - It is not invariably true that when any amount is shown as expenditure or any expenditure is required to be made, the same has to be absorbed in costing of final product unless there is a proof that pricing of the final product has been specifically increased on that score - Refund allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:36:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Reversed: No Proof Duty Cost Passed to Consumers; Unjust Enrichment Principles Applied in Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51681</link>
      <description>Reversal of refund order - principles of unjust enrichment - incidence of duty not passed on - It is not invariably true that when any amount is shown as expenditure or any expenditure is required to be made, the same has to be absorbed in costing of final product unless there is a proof that pricing of the final product has been specifically increased on that score - Refund allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:36:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>