Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Reversal of refund order - principles of unjust enrichment - incidence of duty not passed on - It is not invariably true that when any amount is shown as expenditure or any expenditure is required to be made, the same has to be absorbed in costing of final product unless there is a proof that pricing of the final product has been specifically increased on that score - Refund allowed.
Reversal of refund order - principles of unjust enrichment - incidence of duty not passed on - It is not invariably true that when any amount is shown as expenditure or any expenditure is required to be made, the same has to be absorbed in costing of final product unless there is a proof that pricing of the final product has been specifically increased on that score - Refund allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
