TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 23, 2020Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor or not - M/s. Homestead Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) reached agreement jointly with 'M/s. Golden Peacock Residence Private Limited' have entered into the development agreement with 'M/s. Raheja Developers Limited' and for all purposes it is a joint venture with 'M/s. Golden Peacock Residence Private Limited' who is a subsidiary company and reached agreement with Respondent, but asked to pay the amount to 'M/s. Golden Peacock Residence Private Limited', we hold that the application under Section 7 against 'M/s. Homestead Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd.'- ('Corporate Debtor') is maintainable.
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor or not - M/s. Homestead Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) reached agreement jointly with 'M/s. Golden Peacock Residence Private Limited' have entered into the development agreement with 'M/s. Raheja Developers Limited' and for all purposes it is a joint venture with 'M/s. Golden Peacock Residence Private Limited' who is a subsidiary company and reached agreement with Respondent, but asked to pay the amount to 'M/s. Golden Peacock Residence Private Limited', we hold that the application under Section 7 against 'M/s. Homestead Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd.'- ('Corporate Debtor') is maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.