Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the corporate debtor was maintainable in view of the project structure, demand notices, allotment letter and receipts showing a joint venture arrangement.
Analysis: The record showed that the corporate debtor and its wholly owned subsidiary had entered into a joint venture with a developer, and the demand notice, receipts and allotment letter were issued in the name of the corporate debtor. The correspondence also indicated that payment was to be routed in the name of the subsidiary, which did not negate the corporate debtor's involvement in the project. On these facts, the objection that the corporate debtor was not liable could not be accepted.
Conclusion: The Section 7 application against the corporate debtor was held to be maintainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the admission order under the insolvency proceeding was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where project documents and contemporaneous conduct show that the corporate debtor participated in the transaction as part of a joint venture and the allottee's payments and allotment were traceable to that arrangement, a Section 7 application against the corporate debtor is maintainable.