Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(3) - Service Tax authorities can choose one of the options on behalf of the service provider - the adjudicating authority did not even choose to deal with the binding case law cited before him while dealing with the issues arising for consideration. This arrogant and arbitrary approach adopted by the adjudicating authority cannot be countenanced - HC
CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(3) - Service Tax authorities can choose one of the options on behalf of the service provider - the adjudicating authority did not even choose to deal with the binding case law cited before him while dealing with the issues arising for consideration. This arrogant and arbitrary approach adopted by the adjudicating authority cannot be countenanced - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.