<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Criticizes Authority&#039;s Arbitrary Approach on CENVAT Credit Rule 6(3), Stresses Adherence to Binding Case Law.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49562</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(3) - Service Tax authorities can choose one of the options on behalf of the service provider - the adjudicating authority did not even choose to deal with the binding case law cited before him while dealing with the issues arising for consideration. This arrogant and arbitrary approach adopted by the adjudicating authority cannot be countenanced - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:51:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:51:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=589336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Criticizes Authority&#039;s Arbitrary Approach on CENVAT Credit Rule 6(3), Stresses Adherence to Binding Case Law.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49562</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(3) - Service Tax authorities can choose one of the options on behalf of the service provider - the adjudicating authority did not even choose to deal with the binding case law cited before him while dealing with the issues arising for consideration. This arrogant and arbitrary approach adopted by the adjudicating authority cannot be countenanced - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:51:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>