Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the time limit not exceeding 5 years - It is well-settled that even a retrospective amendment will not take away the vested rights of the parties. The same logic and principle will apply in the case of accrued liability also - when liability has already accrued, the same cannot be washed away or effaced by a subsequent notification
100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the time limit not exceeding 5 years - It is well-settled that even a retrospective amendment will not take away the vested rights of the parties. The same logic and principle will apply in the case of accrued liability also - when liability has already accrued, the same cannot be washed away or effaced by a subsequent notification
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
