<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Retrospective Amendments Cannot Remove Vested Rights or Nullify Accrued Liabilities for Export Oriented Units.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49096</link>
    <description>100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the time limit not exceeding 5 years - It is well-settled that even a retrospective amendment will not take away the vested rights of the parties. The same logic and principle will apply in the case of accrued liability also - when liability has already accrued, the same cannot be washed away or effaced by a subsequent notification</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:14:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=585941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Retrospective Amendments Cannot Remove Vested Rights or Nullify Accrued Liabilities for Export Oriented Units.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49096</link>
      <description>100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the time limit not exceeding 5 years - It is well-settled that even a retrospective amendment will not take away the vested rights of the parties. The same logic and principle will apply in the case of accrued liability also - when liability has already accrued, the same cannot be washed away or effaced by a subsequent notification</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:14:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>