Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the time limit not exceeding 5 years - It is well-settled that even a retrospective amendment will not take away the vested rights of the parties. The same logic and principle will apply in the case of accrued liability also - when liability has already accrued, the same cannot be washed away or effaced by a subsequent notification
100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the time limit not exceeding 5 years - It is well-settled that even a retrospective amendment will not take away the vested rights of the parties. The same logic and principle will apply in the case of accrued liability also - when liability has already accrued, the same cannot be washed away or effaced by a subsequent notification
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
