Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Rebate of duty - Rule 18 of the CE Rules, 2002 - Authority rejected revision application on ground of delay stating that same cannot be accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision - the official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court - the impugned order has resulted in the lack of remedy which is otherwise statutory guaranteed - quashed and remanded
Rebate of duty - Rule 18 of the CE Rules, 2002 - Authority rejected revision application on ground of delay stating that same cannot be accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision - the official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court - the impugned order has resulted in the lack of remedy which is otherwise statutory guaranteed - quashed and remanded
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
