<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision Application Rejected for Duty Rebate u/r 18; Order Quashed for Ignoring Supreme Court Judgment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48647</link>
    <description>Rebate of duty - Rule 18 of the CE Rules, 2002 - Authority rejected revision application on ground of delay stating that same cannot be accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision - the official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court - the impugned order has resulted in the lack of remedy which is otherwise statutory guaranteed - quashed and remanded</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:04:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:04:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision Application Rejected for Duty Rebate u/r 18; Order Quashed for Ignoring Supreme Court Judgment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48647</link>
      <description>Rebate of duty - Rule 18 of the CE Rules, 2002 - Authority rejected revision application on ground of delay stating that same cannot be accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision - the official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court - the impugned order has resulted in the lack of remedy which is otherwise statutory guaranteed - quashed and remanded</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:04:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>