Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Rebate of duty - Rule 18 of the CE Rules, 2002 - Authority rejected revision application on ground of delay stating that same cannot be accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision - the official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court - the impugned order has resulted in the lack of remedy which is otherwise statutory guaranteed - quashed and remanded
Rebate of duty - Rule 18 of the CE Rules, 2002 - Authority rejected revision application on ground of delay stating that same cannot be accepted as a general rule on the basis of relying upon decision - the official could not have summarily distinguished a binding judgment of the Supreme Court - the impugned order has resulted in the lack of remedy which is otherwise statutory guaranteed - quashed and remanded
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
