Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Demand of bank guarantee as security to stay recovery proceedings - under Rule 37(1) of the U.P. VAT Rules, 2008, the respondents would have demanded the petitioner to deposit security in any of the forms as mentioned in the said rule and that bank guarantee is not provided as one of the measures for demanding the security - directed to follow rules
Demand of bank guarantee as security to stay recovery proceedings - under Rule 37(1) of the U.P. VAT Rules, 2008, the respondents would have demanded the petitioner to deposit security in any of the forms as mentioned in the said rule and that bank guarantee is not provided as one of the measures for demanding the security - directed to follow rules
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.