<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Bank Guarantee Not Valid Security u/r 37(1) of U.P. VAT Rules 2008; Stick to Specified Forms.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48572</link>
    <description>Demand of bank guarantee as security to stay recovery proceedings - under Rule 37(1) of the U.P. VAT Rules, 2008, the respondents would have demanded the petitioner to deposit security in any of the forms as mentioned in the said rule and that bank guarantee is not provided as one of the measures for demanding the security - directed to follow rules</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:42:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:42:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Bank Guarantee Not Valid Security u/r 37(1) of U.P. VAT Rules 2008; Stick to Specified Forms.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48572</link>
      <description>Demand of bank guarantee as security to stay recovery proceedings - under Rule 37(1) of the U.P. VAT Rules, 2008, the respondents would have demanded the petitioner to deposit security in any of the forms as mentioned in the said rule and that bank guarantee is not provided as one of the measures for demanding the security - directed to follow rules</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:42:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>